BYD Seal vs Mazda 3: Running Costs in Northern Territory
Data verified April 2025
At this driving profile, the Mazda 3 is the more economical choice over 5 years in Northern Territory.
Running only 15,000 km per year in Northern Territory, the BYD Seal's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The BYD Seal costs $96,034 in total versus $63,811 for the Mazda 3 — a difference of $32,223. The numbers don't reach break-even within this holding period. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The BYD Seal still avoids around 2,351 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.
The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BYD Seal cheaper than the Mazda 3 over 5 years in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory the Mazda 3 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $63,811 total versus $96,034 for the BYD Seal. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.
Does the BYD Seal break even against the Mazda 3 in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory the BYD Seal does not fully recover its price premium within a 5-year holding period. Higher annual km or an extended holding period would change this.
How much does it cost to charge the BYD Seal vs fuel the Mazda 3 per year in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory, charging the BYD Seal costs approximately $768/yr, versus $1,935/yr in petrol for the Mazda 3. Northern Territory's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.