Toyota bZ4X vs Mazda CX-5: Running Costs in South Australia
Data verified April 2025
At this driving profile, the Mazda CX-5 is the more economical choice over 5 years in South Australia.
Running only 15,000 km per year in South Australia, the Toyota bZ4X's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The Toyota bZ4X costs $126,145 in total versus $78,350 for the Mazda CX-5 — a difference of $47,795. The numbers don't reach break-even within this holding period. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The Toyota bZ4X still avoids around 8,037 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.
The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Toyota bZ4X cheaper than the Mazda CX-5 over 5 years in South Australia?
At 15,000 km/yr in South Australia the Mazda CX-5 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $78,350 total versus $126,145 for the Toyota bZ4X. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.
Does the Toyota bZ4X break even against the Mazda CX-5 in South Australia?
At 15,000 km/yr in South Australia the Toyota bZ4X does not fully recover its price premium within a 5-year holding period. Higher annual km or an extended holding period would change this.
How much does it cost to charge the Toyota bZ4X vs fuel the Mazda CX-5 per year in South Australia?
At 15,000 km/yr in South Australia, charging the Toyota bZ4X costs approximately $1,302/yr, versus $2,303/yr in petrol for the Mazda CX-5. South Australia's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.