Volvo EX30 vs Mazda 3: Running Costs in New South Wales
Data verified April 2025
At this driving profile, the Mazda 3 is the more economical choice over 5 years in New South Wales.
Running only 15,000 km per year in New South Wales, the Volvo EX30's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The Volvo EX30 costs $113,316 in total versus $63,331 for the Mazda 3 — a difference of $49,986. The numbers don't reach break-even within this holding period. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The Volvo EX30 still avoids around 382 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.
The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Volvo EX30 cheaper than the Mazda 3 over 5 years in New South Wales?
At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales the Mazda 3 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $63,331 total versus $113,316 for the Volvo EX30. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.
Does the Volvo EX30 break even against the Mazda 3 in New South Wales?
At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales the Volvo EX30 does not fully recover its price premium within a 5-year holding period. Higher annual km or an extended holding period would change this.
How much does it cost to charge the Volvo EX30 vs fuel the Mazda 3 per year in New South Wales?
At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales, charging the Volvo EX30 costs approximately $906/yr, versus $1,719/yr in petrol for the Mazda 3. New South Wales's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.