BYD Atto 3 vs Mazda CX-5: Running Costs in Australian Capital Territory
Data verified April 2025
At this driving profile, the Mazda CX-5 is the more economical choice over 5 years in Australian Capital Territory.
Running only 15,000 km per year in Australian Capital Territory, the BYD Atto 3's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The BYD Atto 3 costs $85,628 in total versus $79,587 for the Mazda CX-5 — a difference of $6,041. Break-even would take approximately 4.8 years — beyond the 5-year horizon. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The BYD Atto 3 still avoids around 13,167 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.
The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BYD Atto 3 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5 over 5 years in Australian Capital Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Australian Capital Territory the Mazda CX-5 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $79,587 total versus $85,628 for the BYD Atto 3. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.
How long does the BYD Atto 3 take to break even against the Mazda CX-5 in Australian Capital Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Australian Capital Territory the BYD Atto 3 breaks even against the Mazda CX-5 after approximately 4.8 years (72,500 km).
How much does it cost to charge the BYD Atto 3 vs fuel the Mazda CX-5 per year in Australian Capital Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Australian Capital Territory, charging the BYD Atto 3 costs approximately $749/yr, versus $2,200/yr in petrol for the Mazda CX-5. Australian Capital Territory's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.