AusDash logoAusDash

BYD Atto 3 vs Mazda CX-5: Running Costs in New South Wales

Data verified April 2025

At this driving profile, the Mazda CX-5 is the more economical choice over 5 years in New South Wales.

Running only 15,000 km per year in New South Wales, the BYD Atto 3's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The BYD Atto 3 costs $86,783 in total versus $77,473 for the Mazda CX-5 — a difference of $9,311. Break-even would take approximately 8.8 years — beyond the 5-year horizon. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The BYD Atto 3 still avoids around 4,220 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.

The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.

Frequently asked questions

Is the BYD Atto 3 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5 over 5 years in New South Wales?

At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales the Mazda CX-5 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $77,473 total versus $86,783 for the BYD Atto 3. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.

How long does the BYD Atto 3 take to break even against the Mazda CX-5 in New South Wales?

At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales the BYD Atto 3 breaks even against the Mazda CX-5 after approximately 8.8 years (132,500 km).

How much does it cost to charge the BYD Atto 3 vs fuel the Mazda CX-5 per year in New South Wales?

At 15,000 km/yr in New South Wales, charging the BYD Atto 3 costs approximately $810/yr, versus $2,177/yr in petrol for the Mazda CX-5. New South Wales's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.

Compare in other states