BYD Atto 3 vs Mazda CX-5: Running Costs in Northern Territory
Data verified April 2025
At this driving profile, the Mazda CX-5 is the more economical choice over 5 years in Northern Territory.
Running only 15,000 km per year in Northern Territory, the BYD Atto 3's higher purchase price doesn't fully pay back through lower running costs within 5 years. The BYD Atto 3 costs $83,548 in total versus $78,241 for the Mazda CX-5 — a difference of $5,307. Break-even would take approximately 4.4 years — beyond the 5-year horizon. If you drive significantly more km per year, or if petrol prices rise substantially, this comparison would shift. The BYD Atto 3 still avoids around 5,806 kg of CO₂ over the ownership period.
The economics don't stack up at this driving distance — increase annual km or extend the holding period to change the picture.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BYD Atto 3 cheaper than the Mazda CX-5 over 5 years in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory the Mazda CX-5 is the cheaper option over 5 years: $78,241 total versus $83,548 for the BYD Atto 3. Use the calculator to adjust for your situation.
How long does the BYD Atto 3 take to break even against the Mazda CX-5 in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory the BYD Atto 3 breaks even against the Mazda CX-5 after approximately 4.4 years (66,250 km).
How much does it cost to charge the BYD Atto 3 vs fuel the Mazda CX-5 per year in Northern Territory?
At 15,000 km/yr in Northern Territory, charging the BYD Atto 3 costs approximately $703/yr, versus $2,451/yr in petrol for the Mazda CX-5. Northern Territory's electricity and fuel rates are applied automatically.